Greentech Update – Body tech

Our occasional series on technology resumes after a four year hiatus…

Following on from Google’s smart glasses, Sony has now filed a patent for a smart wig (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-25099262). We interviewed some up-and-coming entrepreneurs from the body-tech space.

“Pathetic,” spat Brad Schmalzwinkel, CEO of Autobrow, the latest Silicon valley body-tech upstart.  “The Autobrow eyebrow implant can do all that and more.  Our entire Thanksgiving Dinner is being prepared by the eyebrow implant this minute.  I just sit back and watch it work,” he added, wiping a drop of gravy from his cheek.

Schmalzwinkel is not the only Stanford drop-out to have joined the body-tech bandwagon.  Sam J Hucklefinch junior has recently launched “Pimplebot”.  “We can turn any pimple, scab or scar into an integrated cloud-sourced, nano-tech 3D printing factory at the squeeze of a button.  No-one else is close to us in terms of utilising debris body parts.”

The game doesn’t stop with pimples.  Hucklefinch gave us a sneak preview of his revolutionary smart underpants, or “Smarty Pants”.  “Look, lots of our internet usage is private – banking, employment issues, personal communications and so forth.  So surely the best place to do that is where we keep our most private things.  No-one’s gonna look there, are they?  Wearing Hucklefinch’s Smarty Pants allows you to make mobile payments, chat with your mates, browse on Facebook, all controlled by scratching your balls.  This high tech revolution is making a real difference to society.”

However, Greg Gloom, Secretary of the Telford Astrological Society, disagrees.  “It is a tragedy that our brightest young people are wasting years of their lives developing ephemeral hi-tech rubbish, when they could be applying their energies and intelligence to more serious problems of the world.  For example, I myself could use a few young PhD students on my intelligent astrological software.  Sometime in the near future most decision-making will be driven by the stars, but I have not quite got the algorithm working yet.”

Note

For earlier entries in the Greentech Update series:

https://www.thebustard.com/?p=390

https://www.thebustard.com/?p=406

https://www.thebustard.com/?p=419

https://www.thebustard.com/?p=434

https://www.thebustard.com/?p=436

Posted in Humour | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ten policies to reduce demand for carbon intensive living and policies

Engender loathing of cars through humiliation of children whose parents drive them to school in an SUV

Induce spite for poor insulation by attaching social stigma to people with single glazing

 

Create a visceral loathing of driving by adding the smell of vomit to gasoline

Moderate ambition by redesigning the winners’ podium

Reduce demand for long-distance travel through a general relaxation of air safety standards

Reduce demand for carbon intensive products and services by banning their advertising

Reduce demand for meat eating through compulsory installation of abattoir videos at the meat section of the supermarket

Reduce demand for long-distant travel by informing people of the darker side of beach holidays

Create a lifelong aversion to coal by taking children coal-mining

Reduce demand for international travel by stealthily dismantling tourist attractions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Climate change policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

So-whatters, reason and empathy

One of the worst kind of people are “so-whatters”.  That’s unfair.  “So-whatters” perform an important service to force us to think through what we really mean.

A: “Climate change is happening here and now.”

B: “So what?”

A: “It’s affecting loads of people and different species.”

B: “So what?”

A: “That means lots of suffering that needn’t happen.”

B: “So what?”

and so on.

With impeccable reasoning, so-whatters ruthlessly drive you further and further down towards your fundamental assumptions about existence and then at some point they shrug their shoulders: “Whadever.”  Or “Shit happens.”

Climate policy needs to deal with this, because when faced with the challenges which cutting emissions demands of us, we can all become truculent so-whatters.

Reason is great if you are a scientist or a philosopher.  It is a wonderful tool for discovering truths, but it’s hopeless for persuading people of those truths.  Two intelligent and educated people on opposite sides of a cause slog it out with weighty, intellectual blows, but their feet are stuck in clods of mud and neither move.  There are things we love and hate, axiomatically, and we stick to that creed.  Then reason is powerless.

The tool of reason is useful in climate science, but in climate policy it needs help from another corner: empathy.

Empathy allows us to feel the pain that others feel and therefore see their point of view.  With empathy we can come round to someone else’s point of view; without it we remain so-whatters.

To win people over on climate policy, a super-abundance of empathy is needed: to feel the pressing urgency of climate change we need to be able to empathise with foreigners, people of other races, poor people, people not yet born, with beetles, with butterflies, with trees, mountains and glaciers.

There seems to be a small window of time for a child to develop strong empathy: the first five years of life are the best time, after that it gets really hard.  Get the first five years right – parents having plenty of time for the kids, showing them love and compassion – and a lot of the job is done.  Climate policy-makers need to worry less about how to link emissions trading schemes and spend a heck of a lot more time figuring out how to help mums and dads give quality time with their infant children.

Notes

1. Here’s an organisation teaching empathy: http://www.rootsofempathy.org/en/

2. On oxytocin and empathy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFAdlU2ETjU#t=667

 

 

Posted in Climate change policy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ten policies to increase demand for low carbon living and policies

Today a think-tank (IPPR) published a call for a central bank to regulate the EU ETS.  You heard this back in May 2006 on the Bustard (https://www.thebustard.com/?p=457).

So here, a few years too early, are ten policies to cut emissions.  You will need to read the previous post for context.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Climate change policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Policies to change demand for carbon intensive and low carbon products and services

I think I have written this point various times before.  Here it is in pictures.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Climate change policy | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments