Save the planet: laugh at a Porsche.

Chris Rose’s book “What Makes People Tick” describes the worlds and values of three kinds of people: Settlers, Prospectors and Pioneers.  Settlers are conservative people who don’t like change and want security; prospectors are get up and go achievers who yearn for status and recognition; pioneers are ideas people.  Most people tend to one of these three groups.

The group with the biggest footprints[1] are the pioneers because they seek satisfaction through buying lots of flashy possessions and travelling around the world to have experiences.  They are like the shopaholics and the achievers in the rather less rigorous analysis here: https://www.thebustard.com/?p=1328

Their attitude to nature is represented by the diagram below:

from What Makes People Tick: The Three Hidden Worlds of Settlers, Prospectors and Pioneers (Chris Rose, pub Troubadour) © CDSM www.cultdyn.co.uk

Prospectors are the segment on the left of the diagram.  As the colours suggest, nature leaves them cold.  In contrast, nature is important for both settlers and pioneers, hence the yellow, red and purple zones in the settler and pioneer segments (top right and bottom right, respectively).  Nature doesn’t give prospectors the kick that flashy cars give.  This is because dealings with nature do not give them a sense of status or self-worth, which in turn is because the rest of society does not ascribe a high ranking to people who deal with nature.

Rose explains that it is no use criticising prospectors for not liking nature or trying to tell them to be less materialistic.  It is no good “telling them that they should not want new things, or more stuff”, but rather the key is “to change the symbols and experiences of success, so that society rewards people with the esteem of other or self-esteem for less material behaviours.”

It this is to happen consciously it would require a huge effort of social engineering.  Perhaps we get lucky and it happens by itself … we just get tired of all the rubbish and stupidity.  People might see the hollowness of things…

“Sales of flash cars collapsed when they realised that “porsche” meant “erectile disfunction” in Quechuan.”

Or some really charismatic people might see beauty in insulation and shower status and reward on the best insulators.

 

 

[1] Apart from environmental campaigners who also fly around the world a lot.

Posted in Climate change policy, Environment, society, politics and economics | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Prospector sports

Having read Chris Rose’s “What Makes People Tick” I now understand better something I found at Normafa, one of the thickly wooded, hilly spots overlooking Budapest.

A big sign has gone up advertising the Mountain Sports Centre.  The sign lists and illustrates the “sports” it caters for: they are “Off-road Segway”, “E-Bike”, “Laser War”, “Team Building” and “E-Jeep and E-Quad”.

See video: IMG_7139_Normafa video

I thought calling these activities “sports” is very odd.

But having read Rose’s book, I now know that these so-called sports are being promoted to “prospectors” – people who like fashion, thrills, speed, flashiness and technology and who have no interest in nature.  It is clear.  No, they will not notice the plaintive cry of the black woodpecker above the whirr of their electric quad bikes and their excited shouting.

Posted in Environment, society, politics and economics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Bringing the Med to Shropshire

One neat way of cutting down on travel cost and the associate environmental problems is being demonstrated today in Shrewsbury, Shropshire.  An itinerant Mediterranean market is visiting, as it does twice a year.  The rest of the year they tour other UK towns.

You can buy freshly baked baguettes and croissants …

original French cheeses…

 

… a wide range of olives …

It feels a bit like the market in Uzès, in Gard in the south of France.  You can even practise your French or Italian because the stall holders are the genuine thing and happily indulge you in linguistic adventure.

After shopping you can have an expresso at the newly opened Carluccio’s with tables in the sun.  There the waiters and waitresses speak French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish and more.

You don’t need a passport, no silly money and the net emissions are much lower and you are back for the World Cup in the evening in English.

As there is a Mcdonalds in town you can even replicate a trip to the United States, yielding even greater savings in emissions.

Posted in Climate change policy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Car confusion – cynical Jaguar

At Manchester airport recently – where you pick up your luggage – there was a screen showing an advert for an new Jaguar.

It went:

and

 

There is a new villain in town.  So this ad is designed to make me want to go fast and be bad and dangerous and break the law.

Then comes this ad:

That makes me want to drive slowly and attentively and responsibly.

The Jaguar ad then repeats, making me feel villainous, with its high speed race through a city at night:

And on comes a new careful driving ad.

And so it goes on.  More speeding:

and then more safety:

I presume that none of the directors of Jaguar have lost a child in a road accident.

I wondered what impact this contradictory advertising has on the minds of people.  What kind of neural pathways are created when simultaneous, contradictory messages are beamed at your brain?

Contradictory messages are nothing new: growing house prices are good and bad, we should spend and we should save, we should borrow and not get into debt, energy should be cheap and it should be expensive and so forth.  That reflects how complicated things are.

However, to issue contradictory messages does not absolve you of responsibility for each of the separate messages.  Notwithstanding the hypocritical safety ads, the courts should ascribe personal liability and responsibility to the directors of the company if someone buys a Jaguar, goes out into the street at night and knocks over a child on the road. If advertising didn’t work, they wouldn’t do it.

20180822 Update: the ad is banned!

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jul/16/jaguar-ad-tom-hiddleston-banned-youtube

 

Posted in Environment, society, politics and economics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Boredom in Yorkshire and sensory reset

A few days ago I was at a café in London and overheard two city slickers talking big deals.  Then one turned to the other and said: “But you know, what do you do when you get to 46 and have a bit of money saved up?  Do you really need all this?”

As I thought this was a very good question, I took the liberty of butting in.  With appropriate apologies and deference, I pointed out that it is indeed a very good question, and surely the right answer is to take it easy as soon as you can.

They said: “Easier said than done.  Any idea what it costs living in London?”

I said: “Well, you could live in Yorkshire.  It’s cheaper there.”

The one chap said slightly squeakily, pharynx tense with indignation: “I would shoot myself.  I would shoot myself if I had to live in Yorkshire.”

“With the boredom,” I asked?

“No.  Not the boredom.  The mere thought of the boredom.  I’m not that kind of person.  I need the buzz.”

Bored in Yorkshire? With its wild moors and bleak Pennine hills and its lurching crags and wind-worn coast?

We parted agreeing that there is great value in being able to take pleasure in simple things.

Our sensory systems need resetting in order for simple, quiet things to provide contentment.  We have cranked up our demand for speed and risk and excitement too high – the world cannot accommodate 7 billion people seeking such a high level of stimulation.  Sensory reset would be an important part of an effective climate policy for a world of 7 billion busy people.  We should research ethically acceptable sensory reset technologies accordingly.

Posted in Climate change policy | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment